Some consensus please on the libc5-compat issue
This is the 3rd time, I've asked this question, it be nice if I could
have a conclusive answer this time. Christian Meder has reported bugs
against two of my shared library packages (pwdb and gdbm) claiming
that sparc _does_ want libc5-compat packages built; but the last time
I asked on this list, I was told that sparc didn't. Can someone
please tell me once and for all the *right* answer so I can either
close these bugs or fix them?