Re: possibly bug in C headers
> Well I am at work and away from sparcy right now but...
> I noticed last night that there is a header file "socketunion.h"
> I don't know what package it is part of but it is useless.
This is part of libc-dev. You kinda want it. :-)
> It includes 2 other header files...one is from netatalk/ (which only exists
> if the netatalk stuff is installed) and the other is linux/rose.h
> rose.h doesn't exist in my kernel headers package.
I posted a message or two about this a month ago. The general consensus was
that libc6 should come with both netatalk/at.h and rose.h, but due to a bug
with the libc6 Makefiles it failed to include those files. The next release
of libc6, libc6-dev, etc. for the sparc should include this stuff. It
probably would be a good idea for someone to check that glibc-2.0.94 package
that's floating around to see if it has these headers.
> The problem is that socketunion.h is included by other header files
> and thus anything which includes any file which includes it will fail
> to compile.
Copying rose.h from an unstable kernel tree and netatalk/at.h from the i386
netatalk-dev package should also work, but commenting those lines out is
easier.
--
Mike "No .sig for you" Shuey
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: