Re: question about placements in /usr/share/xml
Adam Di Carlo (aph@debian.org) wrote:
>
> I have some questions about where to play stuff in /usr/share/xml as I
> move the sgml-data package over to comply with the XML draft policy.
> These are questions for Mark in particular.
>
> Here's what I have so far:
>
> /usr/share/xml/declaration:
> big5xml.decl xml.dcl xml1n.dcl
>
> /usr/share/xml/entities:
> xml-iso-entities-8879.1986/
>
> /usr/share/xml/qaml:
> catalog catalog.xml qaml-xml.dtd
> old location: /usr/share/sgml/dtd/qaml-xml.dtd
>
> /usr/share/xml/svg:
> catalog catalog.xml svg10.dtd svg11.dtd
> old location: /usr/share/sgml/dtd/svg10.dtd
>
> I've opted to put SVG and QAML in their own directories. Putting them
> under /usr/share/xml/schema seems to conflict with "3.1.3. Local
> Catalogs: /usr/share/xml/.../package-dir/catalog.xml". I would have
> to name the catalogs qaml-xml.catalog or something. Note: this feels
> like a flaw in XML policy.
>
> Does this seem ok? correct?
>
> FYI, of course I'm going to create symlinks from the old locations
> under /usr/share/sgml for backwards-compatability.
Why do you have SGML catalogs under /usr/share/xml? I would expect them to be
under /usr/share/sgml (together with the symlinks).
Thanks,
Ardo
--
Ardo van Rangelrooij
home email: ardo@debian.org
home page: http://people.debian.org/~ardo
GnuPG fp: 3B 1F 21 72 00 5C 3A 73 7F 72 DF D9 90 78 47 F9
Reply to: