question about placements in /usr/share/xml
I have some questions about where to play stuff in /usr/share/xml as I
move the sgml-data package over to comply with the XML draft policy.
These are questions for Mark in particular.
Here's what I have so far:
/usr/share/xml/declaration:
big5xml.decl xml.dcl xml1n.dcl
/usr/share/xml/entities:
xml-iso-entities-8879.1986/
/usr/share/xml/qaml:
catalog catalog.xml qaml-xml.dtd
old location: /usr/share/sgml/dtd/qaml-xml.dtd
/usr/share/xml/svg:
catalog catalog.xml svg10.dtd svg11.dtd
old location: /usr/share/sgml/dtd/svg10.dtd
I've opted to put SVG and QAML in their own directories. Putting them
under /usr/share/xml/schema seems to conflict with "3.1.3. Local
Catalogs: /usr/share/xml/.../package-dir/catalog.xml". I would have
to name the catalogs qaml-xml.catalog or something. Note: this feels
like a flaw in XML policy.
Does this seem ok? correct?
FYI, of course I'm going to create symlinks from the old locations
under /usr/share/sgml for backwards-compatability.
--
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@debian.org.....<URL:http://www.debian.org/>
Reply to: