Re: /usr/lib/sgml
On Sep 18, Ardo van Rangelrooij (ardo@debian.org) wrote:
> Neil Roeth (neil@debian.org) wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Sep 16, Ardo van Rangelrooij (ardo@debian.org) wrote:
> > > Have you perhaps been reading my web page about sgml-base usage (or the lack of
> > > it): http://people.debian.org/~ardo/PACKAGES/SGML/sgml-base.html ???
> >
> > Ardo,
>
> Neil,
>
> > There are several problems with my packages, according to this table. Since
> > the entries are very brief, I am not sure what changes need to be made. Are
> > you planning to put an explanation for each column somewhere? Or, perhaps you
> > could file bug reports telling me briefly what needs to be done to jade, sp,
> > openjade and opensp. If you do that, I will make the changes soon and get new
> > packages out.
>
> The plan is to file bug reports for the severe issues. However, filing a bug
> report for e.g. an empty directory in a package might be a bit of an overkill.
> But I'll also put an explanation of each of the columns on the web page.
I agree. My intent was to tell you I need more info to solve the problems,
but also to let you know that however you want to do it is fine by me,
including either of the ways I suggested or any other.
> > I guess the meaning of the comment for opensp in the column "Files in
> > /usr/lib/sgml", i.e., "No (/usr/lib/opensp)", is that the files in
> > /usr/lib/opensp should be in /usr/share/sgml, correct?
>
> Yep, that's the intention.
Change already made in the new package I am working on.
> > Thanks. I appreciate the effort you've put into this.
>
> You're welcome. As the maintainer of sgml-base I see it more or less as my
> responsibility to make sure it's used properly and according to the policy.
> Why else have it?
Yup.
> I've now also added links to the issues from the main table.
I see, I'll get to work. I still do not know what "Proper scripts for post
and pre" means, though, and since ALL of my packages have a "no" in that
column, I need to know :-)
--
Neil Roeth
Reply to: