Re: /usr/lib/sgml
On Sep 18, Ardo van Rangelrooij (ardo@debian.org) wrote:
> Neil Roeth (neil@debian.org) wrote:
> > I don't have a particularly strong reason to remove /usr/lib/sgml, but I
> > realized if we wait for sarge+1, then that will mean it will exist for a
> > couple of years more. If we forget to do something we need to do for a smooth
> > transition, then we'd have to wait for sarge+2, which is probably a couple of
> > years beyond that. If we can just delete it for sarge without significant
> > negative side effects, that'd be great.
>
> Good points. I would say we start ASAP and see what breaks. That leaves us
> time to fix things.
Fine by me. Do you want to try to get more of a consensus that this is what
more people than just you and me want to do?
--
Neil Roeth
Reply to: