[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Intel Microcode updates

Perhaps you could add a bash script that does automatically download the microcode like f.i. winetricks does with windows code. That way one could be more sure to use the right url for it. I also still have quite a lot of Core 2 computers and would thus profit from such a provision.

Am 12.06.19 um 16:52 schrieb Henrique de Moraes Holschuh:
(BCC'd to #929073 to avoid dragging the BTS into this thread).

On Tue, 11 Jun 2019, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au> schrieb:
Should it be regarded as a bug in the intel-microcode package that it doesn't have this update that is "easy enough to source"? Or do you mean "easy to get
but not licensed for distribution"?
This is covered by #929073, which links to a PDF by Intel (which documents
that Intel won't ship an update for your CPU).
I'd like to add that:

We do not, and will not, distribute in non-free's intel-microcode
anything we did not get from Intel (or from someone else who got it from
Intel with permission to redistribute). This ensures all microcode
updates we distribute in non-free are under a license that allows

Note that, as long as there are very good reasons to do so, I am willing
to distribute microcode updates that are no longer being distributed[1],
since we did receive it with an appropriate license that allows
redistribution in the first place.

Also, one can place whatever microcode updates they got from wherever to
/usr/share/misc/intel-microcode*.bin at their own risk and
responsibility, and the intel-microcode package will attempt to use it.

[1] as in: "they were being distributed by Intel on the Linux microcode
update package in the past, and for more than one release of Intel's
microcode update package".

Reply to: