Re: MIT discovered issue with gcc
On 13Nov26:1545-0500, David L. Craig wrote:
> On 13Nov26:1437-0500, Mark Haase wrote:
> > Therefore, a Linux distribution has 2 choices: (1) wait for upstream
> > patches for bugs/vulnerabilities as they are found, or (2) recompile all
> > packages with optimizations disabled. I don't think proposal #2 would get
> > very far...
> Well, there's always -O1 as opposed to no optimization.
> BTW, -O1 is the minimum permitted for making gcc or glibc,
> I forget which.
I'm rebuilding glibc 2.18 now with -O1 after it refused -O0,
but binutils 2.23.2, gcc 4.8.1, and g++ 4.8.1 are fine with
<not cent from sell>
May the LORD God bless you exceedingly abundantly!
"So the universe is not quite as you thought it was.
You'd better rearrange your beliefs, then.
Because you certainly can't rearrange the universe."