[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: libsnmp security update



On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:11:49PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Alex Samad:
> 
> >> Perl 5.10 has entered testing, so this shouldn't be a problem.  You
> >> probably have got some locally-installed package (or a package
> >> temporarily removed from testing due to incompatibility with Perl 5.10).
> >
> > the problem is I am pinning ldap-utils, because it is the last known
> > good version of ldap-utils that handles encrypted private keys, the
> > ldap-utils linked against gnutls doesn't seem to handle encrypted
> > private keys 
> 
> Are you sure it's not just the format that's changed?
speaking from experience, I could have missed something, but when I
unencrypted a encrypted private key it all worked (i used openssl), my
presumption (and this might be were I am making a mistake) is that the
format for x509 cert's is a standard.  I will follow up on this

Thanks

> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 
> 

-- 
"Whether or not we can be ever fully safe is up -- you know, is up in the air."

	- George W. Bush
10/27/2004
Commenting on the "war on terror" in an interview with Sean Hannity

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: