Re: possible hole in mozilla et al
On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 10:58:38PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Raymond Wood wrote:
> >but I would really like to see either:
> > a) woody receiving security patches as soon as sid and potato;
> > or
> > b) no woody.
> >From a security viewpoint b) is the only option, and we have always said
Otherwise that is not true.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org