Re: possible hole in mozilla et al
On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 10:58:38PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Raymond Wood wrote:
> >but I would really like to see either:
> > a) woody receiving security patches as soon as sid and potato;
> > or
> > b) no woody.
>
> >From a security viewpoint b) is the only option, and we have always said
> so.
s/woody/testing/g
Otherwise that is not true.
Javi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: