Re: atd - can I remove it if I don't use at?
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Alexander Hvostov wrote:
> Red Hat security is always lousy ;)
> Unlike Red Hat, Debian gets security bugs and such fixed in a timely
> manner, especially if you are using the current `unstable' distribution
> (which is presently `woody'); `at' should be fine. Be sure to get security
> updates from security.debian.org if you do not use unstable...
Even with unstable having security.d.o in the sources list is a good
idea since not all fixes make it into unstable as fast as into security.d.o.