Hi, On Thu, 25 Oct 2018, Aleksey Kravchenko wrote: > One problem is apt-cache rdepends shows that only forensics-all depends > on libpff packages. May be apt-cache skipped some contrib packages. > Should we continue to support it? Bug 764527 [4] says that some people > need it. The source package builds pff-tools which are tools that end users can use. It's not only a library. So I guess that we should continue to support it. > If we are not dropping the package, the other problem is that the last > package version [3] was not imported into git, but Raphael already made > two new commits. > > I suggest 'rebasing' two Raphael commits over Imported package, as I've > done in a fork [2]. To do this we need to overwrite last to commits in > the main repository. Neither of this is needed. You can just do a proper merge. You run "gbp import-dsc" of 20120802-5.1 in a branch that contains the 20120802-5 tag. Then you switch back to debian/master and you merge your temporary branch. That's the correct solution that doesn't need history rewriting. > Raphael, can you please grant me access rights to the libpff repository > to work on it? You already have access to all pkg-security repositories. You can check by yourself: https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/libpff/project_members Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Support Debian LTS: https://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html Learn to master Debian: https://debian-handbook.info/get/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature