Re: Are we still trying to do scipy 1.10, given transition freeze?

[Drew Parsons <dparsons@debian.org>]

On 2023-01-26 14:32, Graham Inggs wrote:
> > I'll try to wait for scipy's own tests (armel, riscv64) before 
> > uploading
> > to unstable.
>
> riscv64 is not a release architecture (yet) and the hardware is still
> a little slow, so it is not enabled for experimental pseudo excuses.

True.  armel is the main one to wait for, if it doesn't take too much 
longer.