On Sun, Oct 09, 2022 at 12:47:14PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > Nilesh Patra <nilesh@debian.org> writes: > > > I could push the package to new again, with a new revision > > but I fear another CVE being discovered meanwhile and we run into circles. > > You can temporarily have a separate branch nominally targeting > experimental, with docs included and version numbers along the lines of > 1.2.0-1+doc or 1.2.0-1+exp1; subsequent uploads to unstable could either > merge it or proceed with time-sensitive fixes, as appropriate. Looks like I skipped reading the version numbers properly. Do you mean "1.2.0+doc-2" instead? I ask this because uploading a "1.2.0-2+doc" to experimtnal means it'd be a problem if we meanwhile want to upload a new revision "1.2.0-3" to unstable, but "1.2.0+doc-1" would be ok since we can keep uploading 1.2.0-$rev to unstable meanwhile. Ofcourse, it could be worked around using numbers like "1.2.0-2.1" to unstable or similar but then I am not sure how uploading 1.2.0-2+doc is better than uploading 1.2.0-3 to experimental, unless I misunderstand you. Could you let me know? -- Best, Nilesh
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature