[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Upload Requests



Hi Drew,

Le 17/06/2022 à 15:28, Drew Parsons a écrit :
On 2022-06-16 15:06, Julien Lamy wrote:
Hi Ileana,
I've uploaded xsimd. Thanks for your work!
--
Julien

Le 16/06/2022 à 14:43, Ileana Dumitrescu a écrit :
Hi,

I contributed and merged code into salsa for several science packages. Can someone please sponsor the uploads? Thank you!

...
xsimd (8.1.0-1)
...

Hi Julian, Ilean,  xsimd 8.1.0 seems to break xtensor 0.23.10, which is documented to use xsimd ^7.4.8.

I've tried building a newer version of xtensor (0.24.2, which should be compatible with xsimd 8), but I get a build error, see related issue on https://github.com/xtensor-stack/xsimd/issues/771.

In the worst case, I could maintain the two versions in two separate packages (libxsimd7-dev and libxsimd8-dev). Let me know what would be best.


dolfinx now fails to build, via basix which uses xtensor (and activates xsimd):

-- Adding /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/basix to Basix/xtensor/xtl search hints CMake Error at /usr/share/cmake-3.23/Modules/CMakeFindDependencyMacro.cmake:47 (find_package):   Could not find a configuration file for package "xsimd" that is compatible
   with requested version "7.4.4".

   The following configuration files were considered but not accepted:

    /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/cmake/xsimd/xsimdConfig.cmake, version: 8.1.0

Call Stack (most recent call first):
  /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/cmake/xtensor/xtensorConfig.cmake:63 (find_dependency)   /usr/share/cmake-3.23/Modules/CMakeFindDependencyMacro.cmake:47 (find_package)   /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/cmake/basix/BasixConfig.cmake:43 (find_dependency)
   CMakeLists.txt:161 (find_package)


-- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!


The error message comes from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/cmake/xtensor/xtensorConfig.cmake, which (for xtensor 0.23.10) uses
   find_dependency(xsimd 7.4.4)
when XTENSOR_USE_XSIMD is set

Drew

--
Julien

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: