Re: Spitting up clhep or not
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 3:40 PM Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> wrote:
>
> Am Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 11:55:45AM +0100 schrieb Stephan Lachnit:
> > >
> > > * split libraries into own packages
> > >
> > > I wonder whether we should do it right now since we need to
> > > pass new queue anyway.
> >
> > Yes, I think we should do that now.
>
> Argh, I've uploaded a couple of hours ago to new. I wonder how
> important this is for you and what action we should do right now:
>
> 1. Ask ftpmaster for a manual reject, do the split and re-upload.
> If you think this is the best course of action and just do
> so (including the split since I have not so much interest in
> it but can help if you are not that familiar with d-shlibs.
> You can find an example in ncbi-vdi package.)
>
> 2. Wait / "hope" for a reject due to other reasons, fix the
> reject and do the split.
>
> 3. Let the package clear new and do the split whenever someone
> might have time.
Option 3 is fine, it is not urgent at all.
> > > * don't build static libs
> > >
> > > I do not see any reason to do so. Default libs / libdevel
> > > packages should feature shared and static lib (and d-shlibs
> > > which I used relies on this default. So if you ask me I'd
> > > remove this TODO item
> >
> > Agreed, we can ship static libs.
>
> OK. Please adapt TODO accordingly.
>
> > > * fix documentation install folder
> >
> > Tbh I don't recall. I don't have the time to look at the packaging
> > this week, but I will take a look at it next week.
>
> Either clarify that item or remove it once you have time.
I will adapt the TODO next week.
Regards,
Stephan
Reply to: