Re: Spitting up clhep or not
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 8:04 PM Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> wrote:
>
> Hi Stephan
>
> Am Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 03:28:18PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> > Am Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 02:14:57PM +0000 schrieb Stephan Lachnit (@stephanlachnit):
> > > Thank you so much! This is the last missing dependency for Geant4.
> >
> > Unfortunately its not done yet. I need to do a binary upload to new due
> > to changed binary name. To do so I'll move to d-shlibs since I think we
> > should use properly named library package fitting SONAME and d-shlibs is
> > granting this. I'm currently working on this.
>
> I finalised the move to d-shlibs after I managed to fix SONAME.
> These where two items of debian/TODO which are solved now.
> Now the debian/TODO you've created has the following items:
>
> * split libraries into own packages
>
> I wonder whether we should do it right now since we need to
> pass new queue anyway.
Yes, I think we should do that now.
> * don't build static libs
>
> I do not see any reason to do so. Default libs / libdevel
> packages should feature shared and static lib (and d-shlibs
> which I used relies on this default. So if you ask me I'd
> remove this TODO item
Agreed, we can ship static libs.
> * fix documentation install folder
Tbh I don't recall. I don't have the time to look at the packaging
this week, but I will take a look at it next week.
Regards and thanks again,
Stephan
Reply to: