Hi Markus, On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 03:55:51PM +0100, Markus Blatt wrote: > > Looks like opm-upscaling and opm-simulators are not building on buildd machines > > as seen here[1][2] > > It chokes at missing B-D[3] > > > > | opm-upscaling build-depends on missing: > > | - libsuperlu3-dev:amd64 (>= 3.0) > > > > Can you check+fix this? > > > > Thanks for the hint. Somehow this was not a problem for salsaci and local pbuilder. There > used to be a libsuperlu3-dev package in older Debian releases. Actually, I was seeing the above mentioned problem in my sbuild environment as well, seems that it was somehow confusing apt. I had to explicitly add a `--build-dep-resolver=aptitude` to get those building. I thought the problem is sitting in front of my screen, as salsa CI went fine -- which is actually closer to the buildd machines. But apparently that wasn't the case, somehow. > Anyway the dependency on > libsuperlu-dev and libsuitesparse-dev is already handled as a dependency of libdune-istl-dev. > No need to list it again and I removed the offending entry: Yeah, I noticed that as well, and wanted you to confirm on that once as well. > Build-Depends: ..., libsuperlu3-dev (>= 3.0) | libsuperlu-dev (>= 4.3), ... > > Maybe buildd is different and does not allow packages that do not exist? I guess this is more related to how apt resolves build-deps, admittedly I did not investigate much at that end. > [...] > Updated source can be found at > https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/opm-upscaling > https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/opm-simulators > > UNRELEASED and untagged as requested, but version incremented. Great, thanks for working on these, I uploaded both. Regards, Nilesh
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature