Hi Nilesh, Am Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 01:07:02AM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 10:28:58PM +0100, Markus Blatt wrote:> Done, thanks for your work! Thanks a lot.Looks like opm-upscaling and opm-simulators are not building on buildd machines as seen here[1][2] It chokes at missing B-D[3] | opm-upscaling build-depends on missing: | - libsuperlu3-dev:amd64 (>= 3.0) Can you check+fix this?
Thanks for the hint. Somehow this was not a problem for salsaci and local pbuilder. There used to be a libsuperlu3-dev package in older Debian releases. Anyway the dependency on libsuperlu-dev and libsuitesparse-dev is already handled as a dependency of libdune-istl-dev. No need to list it again and I removed the offending entry: Build-Depends: ..., libsuperlu3-dev (>= 3.0) | libsuperlu-dev (>= 4.3), ... Maybe buildd is different and does not allow packages that do not exist? I also fixed an autpkgtest problem for python3-opm-simulators (for 2021.10-1 autodep8-python3 did add a test that tried to import opm_simulators, but we use opm.simulators instead). I simply added a custom python test. Hope that will prevent the autogeneration. Works on salsaci. Updated source can be found at https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/opm-upscaling https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/opm-simulators UNRELEASED and untagged as requested, but version incremented. Thanks a lot for the help. Cheers, Markus
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature