Hi Maarten, On 2/9/22 11:51 PM, Maarten L. Hekkelman wrote:
Op 9-2-2022 om 17:38 schreef Andrius Merkys:By the way, maybe you have tested the reverse dependencies?<blush/> ehm, how am I supposed to do that? Is there a simple way to test this? I guess I should know the answer, but I don't.
Three ways: 1) Use ratt[1] 2) Use ruby-team/meta script 3) Upload to experimental and check for britney's pseudo-excuses The third way might not be very reliable, since that will test only reverse-dependencies, and not reverse-build-dependencies. Since the reverse(+build)-deps does not seem very high for this package (pasted at the end of this email) maybe you could go wtih 1) or 2) [1]: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ratt [2]: https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/meta [3]: https://release.debian.org/britney/pseudo-excuses-experimental.html Regards, Nilesh $ reverse-depends libmmdb2-dev Reverse-Depends * libclipper-dev * libssm-dev $ reverse-depends libmmdb2-dev -b Reverse-Build-Depends * clipper * libccp4 * molmodel * ssm
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature