Re: Bug#945389: Tried to upgrade skimage to see whether #945389 is fixed but failed

To: "Andreas Tille" <tille@debian.org>, "Ole Streicher" <olebole@debian.org>
Cc: 945389@bugs.debian.org, "Debian Science List" <debian-science@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#945389: Tried to upgrade skimage to see whether #945389 is fixed but failed
From: "Stefan van der Walt" <stefanv@berkeley.edu>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2019 12:38:24 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] fd574f66-d351-45ac-8c31-cfd668667b7e@www.fastmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20191203103049.GH9744@an3as.eu>
References: <[🔎] 568b58e5-49e4-aec5-6424-c40df90e2b7c@debian.org> <157458048090.2280526.11603008572967413636.reportbug@osiris.linuxminded.xs4all.nl> <[🔎] 20191203103049.GH9744@an3as.eu>

Hi Andreas and Ole,

The problem here stems from an old version of Cython.  My recommended approach would be to build from the git tag instead of the source tarball (i.e., the version without pre-generated Cython files).  I don't think the Cython-related patches that were applied since would then be necessary.

I will no longer be doing packaging work for scikit-image, so feel free to remove me from the maintainer list (I thought it had already been transferred to the science team a while ago).

Best regards,
Stéfan

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bug#945389: Tried to upgrade skimage to see whether #945389 is fixed but failed
  - From: Andreas Tille <andreas@fam-tille.de>

References:
- Re: Tried to upgrade skimage to see whether #945389 is fixed but failed
  - From: Ole Streicher <olebole@debian.org>
- Re: Tried to upgrade skimage to see whether #945389 is fixed but failed
  - From: Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Fwd: Re: libmseed licensing
Next by Date: Re: Fwd: Re: libmseed licensing
Previous by thread: Re: Tried to upgrade skimage to see whether #945389 is fixed but failed
Next by thread: Re: Bug#945389: Tried to upgrade skimage to see whether #945389 is fixed but failed
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread