Re: Pandas
Hi,
just in case you need my help: I'm offline-ish until 2019-03-04
Kind regards, Andreas.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:47:31PM +0000, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> Any comment (and preferably upload) on statsmodels? That needs to be
> uploaded by the 2nd (in testing by the 12th) if at all, as it has changes
> that wouldn't be allowed under full freeze.
>
> On 27/02/2019 14:46, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 27 Feb 2019, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > I'd prefer if you would move the
> > > 0.24 packaging to some separate branch (debian-experimental is covered but may
> > > be debian-0.24 or something like this?) and keep branch debian for what we are
> > > really releasing.
> >
> > well "releasing" is a loaded term. I guess you are talking about uploading to
> > unstable so it manages to get into buster. Since "debian" branch already got
> > its 0.24, what about starting debian-buster branch off debian/0.23.3-1 ?
>
> That's what I was planning, like statsmodels already has. (I was going to
> call it 'buster', but I don't care about the name.)
>
> > otherwise -- I am ok to hard-reset and force push debian to the debian/0.23.3-1
> > state -- everyone should just beware of it, and then progress
> > debian-experimental to current state of debian (v0.24.1-972-g1cfbd07c7)
>
> I'd rather not rebase/force-push a public repository (even if it is in
> practice unlikely that anyone other than us has downloaded it). It should
> be possible to get to that state without doing so ("merge" debian into
> debian-experimental, then commit a "revert to 0.23" to debian).
>
> (In general, I slightly prefer the "'debian' is development head, whether
> that's currently unstable or experimental (due to a freeze or a transition)"
> layout. However, that may be because the packages I currently maintain
> rarely needed any changes in unstable while the package was also in
> experimental, and this layout hence avoided branching most of the time.
> Something as central as pandas may need two active branches more often.)
>
>
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: