Hello, On 24/05/18 10:38, Julien Puydt wrote: > Hi > Le 24 mai 2018 07:03, Jerome BENOIT <calculus@rezozer.net> a écrit : >> >> I am confused here: >> do you mean that the dependant packages must be uploaded with a build-dep on = 5.2.0 ? >> > > The current fpylll isn't compatible with the next fplll, so I think it's better to reupload it with a cutting dep and let it go to testing. > > When we will be done checking everything is alright in experimental and will start the transition, the package manager will know what to do. > > Or we might get lucky and the new fpylll will be compatible with both versions of fplll... > > Is the new fpylll released? Can you check it against the fplll on salsa? > > Cheers, Finally I could not have a look. Having said that, I think it would make more sense as maintainer of fplll that you maintain fpylll : if you want to do so, just remove my name from the Uploaders list, add your name, and eventually let me know. Cheers, Jerome > > Snark > -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calculus@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature