Re: Help needed for pandas bug: Could anybody verify the suspicion that tzdata might have some influence?

To: debian-science@lists.debian.org, 858881@bugs.debian.org, 858260@bugs.debian.org
Cc: "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com>
Subject: Re: Help needed for pandas bug: Could anybody verify the suspicion that tzdata might have some influence?
From: Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2017 10:01:21 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20170402080121.GA30643@an3as.eu>
In-reply-to: <20170328155243.5gp3guzcznbu7euz@hopa.kiewit.dartmouth.edu>
References: <20170328093728.GB27593@an3as.eu> <1229829d-28aa-0726-b1dc-6bce9f5c4ec6@gmail.com> <20170328134241.ay53tbm4yebbpqh3@hopa.kiewit.dartmouth.edu> <ytzlgrpsduq.fsf@news.ole.ath.cx> <20170328155243.5gp3guzcznbu7euz@hopa.kiewit.dartmouth.edu>

Hi Yaroslav,

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:52:43AM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> 
> > I have filed another bug for that (#858881); it would be nice if that
> > could be fixed as well.
> 
> what matters ATM is that it (package) built fine 
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=pandas&ver=0.19.2-5&arch=amd64

Rebecca N. Palmer has kindly provided a patch that fits the discussion
inside the bug (thanks a lot Rebecca).  It worked for me and thus I
uploaded (having a pristine-tar branch in Git would have been convient).

Yaroslav, would you mind forwarding the patch upstream?

Kind regards

      Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Help needed for pandas bug: Could anybody verify the suspicion that tzdata might have some influence?
  - From: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug#859255: binNMU needed for more R packages.
Next by Date: Re: openmeca_2.1.7-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Previous by thread: Re: Bug#859255: binNMU needed for more R packages.
Next by thread: Re: Help needed for pandas bug: Could anybody verify the suspicion that tzdata might have some influence?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread