Re: Bug#859255: binNMU needed for more R packages.

To: Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org>, 859255@bugs.debian.org
Cc: control@bugs.debian.org, debian-med@lists.debian.org, debian-science@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#859255: binNMU needed for more R packages.
From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 11:30:50 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 1491042650.1997.51.camel@adam-barratt.org.uk>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20170401062453.jlyxackh26qwjfli@bubu.plessy.net>
References: <[🔎] 20170401062453.jlyxackh26qwjfli@bubu.plessy.net>

severity 859255 normal
user release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
usertags 859255 binnmu
thanks

On Sat, 2017-04-01 at 15:24 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: grave
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-med@lists.debian.org, debian-science@lists.debian.org

I fixed this last time, but didn't explicitly tell you.

release.debian.org bugs are *not* RC, please don't set them as such. The
packages that you're asking for binNMUs for might be broken, the release
metapackage is not.

Regards,

Adam

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#859255: binNMU needed for more R packages.
  - From: Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#859255: binNMU needed for more R packages.
Next by Date: Re: Help needed for pandas bug: Could anybody verify the suspicion that tzdata might have some influence?
Previous by thread: Bug#859255: binNMU needed for more R packages.
Next by thread: Re: Bug#859255: binNMU needed for more R packages.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread