[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Question about packaging projectchrono and duplicated source code



On 02/05/17 22:39, dada wrote:

[....]

> 
> Hello, I push a first version of the projectchrono package.
> See ssh://git.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/projectchrono.git

please, push pristine-tar branch.

> 
> Some observations :
> 
>  - The embedded bullet source files are located at 'src/chrono/collisionbullet'
>    and 'src/chrono/collision/gimpact'
> 
>  - If you compare the main stream source of bullet and the projectchrono
>    bullet files, a lot of them are identical. However some difference exists.
>    Even if the difference are small it makes the andreas' solution very
>    difficult.
> 
>  - Several modules are provided but I would like to focus only on the src/chrono
>    module first.
> 
>  - At that time, I put information in d/copyright only for src/chrono files.
> 
>  - The 'src/chrono_thirdparty' contains some sources already packaged by debian.
> 
>  - Excepted the 'tinyobjloader', these third party source files are not necessary
>    to compile the main module 'src/chrono'
> 
>  - I sent an email to the projectchrono upstream authors, I think they will be
> pleased
>    to help us...

great !!!


> At that time, I don't document myself on how to package dynamic libraries. I
> will do
> it in the next weeks.

I will try to make a prototype.


Best regards,

Leopold


-- 
--
Linux User 152692     GPG: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA
Catalonia
-------------------------------------
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?


Reply to: