Re: Question about packaging projectchrono and duplicated source code
On 02/05/17 22:39, dada wrote:
[....]
>
> Hello, I push a first version of the projectchrono package.
> See ssh://git.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/projectchrono.git
please, push pristine-tar branch.
>
> Some observations :
>
> - The embedded bullet source files are located at 'src/chrono/collisionbullet'
> and 'src/chrono/collision/gimpact'
>
> - If you compare the main stream source of bullet and the projectchrono
> bullet files, a lot of them are identical. However some difference exists.
> Even if the difference are small it makes the andreas' solution very
> difficult.
>
> - Several modules are provided but I would like to focus only on the src/chrono
> module first.
>
> - At that time, I put information in d/copyright only for src/chrono files.
>
> - The 'src/chrono_thirdparty' contains some sources already packaged by debian.
>
> - Excepted the 'tinyobjloader', these third party source files are not necessary
> to compile the main module 'src/chrono'
>
> - I sent an email to the projectchrono upstream authors, I think they will be
> pleased
> to help us...
great !!!
> At that time, I don't document myself on how to package dynamic libraries. I
> will do
> it in the next weeks.
I will try to make a prototype.
Best regards,
Leopold
--
--
Linux User 152692 GPG: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA
Catalonia
-------------------------------------
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
Reply to: