Do you want us to have a look at it and give you pointers to improve it
or do you think it is ready for review ?
Ghis
On 29/10/15 19:15, Nico Schlömer wrote:
> Jonathan,
>
> I'm maintaining a nightly PPA for Trilinos for a couple of years now
> [1]. Before it gets into Debian/Ubuntu proper, you might get some
> mileage out of that.
>
> Cheers,
> Nico
>
> [1] https://launchpad.net/~nschloe/+archive/ubuntu/trilinos-nightly/
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 8:10 PM Jonathan Perry-Houts
> <jperryh2@uoregon.edu <mailto:jperryh2@uoregon.edu>> wrote:
>
> Ah, I didn't realize anyone was working on packaging Trilinos. That's
> fantastic! Looking forward to it.
>
> And for what it's worth, I agree that OpenMPI warning is really
> annoying. I've settled on setting -Wno-literal-suffix in all of my
> Makefiles to avoid being flooded with those messages.
>
> I'm new to Debian packaging, but if there's something that needs
> testing, or something simple I can help out with I'd be happy to
> contribute.
>
> Cheers,
> Jonathan
>
> On 10/29/2015 10:46 AM, Nico Schlömer wrote:
> > Thanks for the input!
> > I'll first get Trilinos out the door, after that I'll have more
> time to
> > look at openmpi.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Nico
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 6:17 PM Ghislain Vaillant
> <ghisvail@gmail.com <mailto:ghisvail@gmail.com>
> > <mailto:ghisvail@gmail.com <mailto:ghisvail@gmail.com>>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Nico,
> >
> > OpenMPI looks quite a beast to maintain due to the sheer
> number of
> > patches. Updating the source package to the latest upstream
> version is
> > unlikely to be a walk in the park as a result.
> >
> > I believe your best bet would be to kickstart this effort,
> ask the list
> > when you're stuck, and hope the maintainers eventually join you
> > on-board. I could personally find some time to help on a few
> things, but
> > would definitely not be able / willing to do this alone.
> That's probably
> > the case for other people too.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Ghis
> >
> >
> > On 29/10/15 16:45, Nico Schlömer wrote:
> > > > Have you think to contact to the maintainers?
> > >
> > > Well, I filed a bug report a while ago on the upgrade
> issue. Not sure
> > > how else to contact anyone?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Nico
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 8:42 AM Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
> > > <leo@alaxarxa.net <mailto:leo@alaxarxa.net>
> <mailto:leo@alaxarxa.net <mailto:leo@alaxarxa.net>>
> > <mailto:leo@alaxarxa.net <mailto:leo@alaxarxa.net>
> <mailto:leo@alaxarxa.net <mailto:leo@alaxarxa.net>>>> wrote:
> > >
> > > El Dimecres, 28 d'octubre de 2015, a les 16:42:06, Nico
> > Schlömer va
> > > escriure:
> > > > Hi everyone,
> > > >
> > > > the OpenMPI in Debian is somewhat outdated; the
> current stable
> > > version is
> > > > 1.10.1 [1], Debian ships 1.6.5 [2]. A bug has been filed
> > for this
> > > a while
> > > > ago [3].
> > > >
> > > > When compiling a C++11-enabled source, one gets loads of
> > compiler
> > > warnings
> > > > of the kind
> > > > ```
> > > > /usr/lib/openmpi/include/mpi_portable_platform.h:374:34:
> > warning:
> > > invalid
> > > > suffix on literal; C++11 requires a space between
> literal and
> > > string macro
> > > > [-Wliteral-suffix]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> _STRINGIFY(__GNUC__)"."_STRINGIFY(__GNUC_MINOR__)"."_STRINGIFY(__GNUC_PATCHL
> > > > EVEL__) ^
> > > > /usr/lib/openmpi/include/mpi_portable_platform.h:374:63:
> > warning:
> > > invalid
> > > > suffix on literal; C++11 requires a space between
> literal and
> > > string macro
> > > > [-Wliteral-suffix]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> _STRINGIFY(__GNUC__)"."_STRINGIFY(__GNUC_MINOR__)"."_STRINGIFY(__GNUC_PATCHL
> > > > EVEL__) ^
> > > > ```
> > > > It would be easy to turn them off, but perhaps even
> easier
> > would
> > > be to
> > > > patch the current openmpi 1.6.5 to include the spaces.
> > > >
> > > > Who would need to be contacted about this?
> > >
> > > Have you think to contact to the maintainers?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Leopold
> > >
> > > --
> > > --
> > > Linux User 152692 GPG: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA
> > > Catalonia
> > > -------------------------------------
> > > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally
> > read text.
> > > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
> > > A: Top-posting.
> > > Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
> > >
> >
>