Re: Sagemath: going further
Hi,
Le 03/02/2015 17:25, Tobias Hansen a écrit :
Hi Julien,
I like that the patch is still quite small. Are you aware of the similar
patches Fedora is using?
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/sagemath.git/tree/
No... perhaps I should have a look.
I'll see if I get around to setting up a packaging git repo where the
sage repo is included as a git submodule and your patch is applied via
quilt. I think that way the packaging can be handled quite nicely. What
do you think? I just need you to put the commands for building into
debian/rules then. (Or if you want you can also set up everything.)
I don't feel confortable with packaging sage myself, so my goal is to
grease things around so when someone gets to that work, things will go
smoothly.
For the moment I just want to have this to have the things you do
(install build dependencies, patch (the correct upstream commit of)
sage, build, test) easily reproducable by everyone. Putting sage itself
into packages is not so important just yet.
Are you working on unstable or testing? I guess we can start with sage
6.5.rc0?
I'm using unstable, and sage-6.5.rc0, but I'm moving forward with their
versions.
But there are a few caveats :
- I've done a few strange things with maxima to get the ECL-in-maxima to
work -- but I think some of the biggest remaining issues are in there!
- I also have a modified lcalc package ; I pushed my changes to git
already, but didn't ask for sponsorship yet.
- and I think that's all... but I'm not 100% sure... I should try to
find out which of my packages don't come from debian :-/
Snark
Reply to: