Re: Sagemath: going further
Hi Julien,
I like that the patch is still quite small. Are you aware of the similar
patches Fedora is using?
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/sagemath.git/tree/
I'll see if I get around to setting up a packaging git repo where the
sage repo is included as a git submodule and your patch is applied via
quilt. I think that way the packaging can be handled quite nicely. What
do you think? I just need you to put the commands for building into
debian/rules then. (Or if you want you can also set up everything.)
For the moment I just want to have this to have the things you do
(install build dependencies, patch (the correct upstream commit of)
sage, build, test) easily reproducable by everyone. Putting sage itself
into packages is not so important just yet.
Are you working on unstable or testing? I guess we can start with sage
6.5.rc0?
Best,
Tobias
On 02/01/2015 08:37 PM, Julien Puydt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been a little busy with sage recently :
>
> jpuydt@cauchy:~/sage-exp$ wc -l /tmp/ptestlong.log.*
> 247159 /tmp/ptestlong.log.1
> 91206 /tmp/ptestlong.log.2
> 21563 /tmp/ptestlong.log.3
> 13453 /tmp/ptestlong.log.4
> 15762 /tmp/ptestlong.log.5
> 12012 /tmp/ptestlong.log.6
> 10320 /tmp/ptestlong.log.7
> 411475 total
>
> Let me remind you all of this is done by using as many system-installed
> packages as possible, in order to see which debian packages need to be
> modified and how. Until now, only maxima needs some love, and we're
> lacking packages for : libgap, cddlib, rubiks, sagenb, sagetex, singular
> and jmol.
>
> I have attached my current patch ; I'm sorry it is a big contains-all
> patch and not a series, but it's easier to work like this for the
> moment. I'm exploring uncharted territory, not doing clean packaging. Yet.
>
> The src/sage/interfaces/gp.py part has been quite painful to obtain, but
> might make Felix cry -- of joy!
>
> I hope that helps,
>
> Snark on #debian-science
Reply to: