On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:25:55PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > I'd think they could save some time by using > the Blends framework instead of maintaining Wiki pages with package > names manually - but well obviously there is definitely a lack of > communication between Debian Science and pkg-electronics. > [...] > In any case its fine to add the binary package names to Debian Science > electronics task since this is totally orthogonal to where a package is > maintained technically. I'm personally hoping for > some better communication by the pkg-electronics maintainers with Debian > Science and perhaps they might be interested in how they might be able > to enhance their workflow by tools which are designed to pool groups of > packages sensibly. ---end quoted text--- Actually I am a member of both teams, and I recall that I did fill some metafile in Debian science with info about packages maintained by pkg-electronics. If there is anything else to be done, I would be glad to help (given I got bandwidth for it). -- أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy) Digital design engineer GPG KeyID: 0xEDDDA1B7 GPG Fingerprint: 8206 A196 2084 7E6D 0DF8 B176 BC19 6A94 EDDD A1B7
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature