Re: Bug#761364: ITP: abc -- A System for Sequential Synthesis and Verification
Hi Andreas,
I have now moved to alioth for the git repos, learnt how to use
pristine-tar and related tools, and created the relevant branches.
However, I'm a bit confused with something. Should I perhaps rather
package it as part of the pkg-electronics team? What is really the
difference between Debian-Science/electronics and pkg-electronics? I
think at least the "secion" in the control file should be
"electronics".
Regards,
Ruben
2014-09-15 20:01 GMT+02:00 Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>:
> Hi Ruben,
>
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 06:39:28PM +0200, Ruben Undheim wrote:
>> Hi Dirk and Andreas,
>>
>> Thanks for showing interest and responding!
>>
>> I did propose the name "berkeley-abc" quite quickly after first
>> posting the ITP (and retitled the bug). It is already on mentors with
>> that name (http://mentors.debian.net/package/berkeley-abc), and the
>> executable is also called berkeley-abc now.
>
> This sounds sensible.
>
>> I'm happy to maintain it as part of the Debian Science team, but I
>> will first then need to learn how this works.
>
> The Debian Science team has some policy[1] you might consider helpful to
> find out how it works. You have also good chances to find a sponsor for
> your packages in case you might need one. I (strongly) recommend to
> read the Debian Science mailing list and to use the packaging repository
> since your package(s) fit perfectly into the electronics task of Debian
> Science and can be promoted via the according tasks page[3] and also
> included into the science-electronics metapackage.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
> [1] http://debian-science.alioth.debian.org/debian-science-policy.html
> [2] https://wiki.debian.org/DebianPureBlends/SoB
> [3] http://blends.debian.org/science/tasks/electronics
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: