Re: RFS: libcerf - library for complex error function

[debian-devel@liska.ath.cx (Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr)]

Eugen Wintersberger <eugen.wintersberger@gmail.com> writes:
>> - since the sources are under MIT license, the packaging should as well.
>>   GPL is very restrictive for libraries.
>
> This would basically mean that the entire package files will be
> distributed under the MIT license - am I right?

I would think this as optimal. At the end, it is, however your own
decision as long as it is covered by the DFSG.

GPL may just have the danger that there are incompatible licenses, and
this would limit its linking.

>> - Copyright is incomplete, f.e.  Antonio Cervellino is missing from
>>   fortran/ subdir
>
> Yes - and another question: would you find it reasonable to provide an
> extra package for the Fortran bindings?

I have no glue. Maybe, someone else has? Or look around in Debian how
f95 bindings are usually done.

Best

Ole