Re: libvtk
If the order doesn't matter, is it possible to package the most recent
6.0 version first?
Thank you,
ST
On Thu, 2013-09-12 at 07:30 +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
> Hi Mathieu,
>
> thanks for the note. You are right, we should probably have it as a separate
> source package.
>
> Anton
>
> 2013/9/12 Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>:
> > Anton,
> >
> > Here is my two cents, given the large number of API/ABI changes, I
> > doubt most rdepends will actually compile.
> > Again *IMHO*, I would have upload vtk5.x one last time, and provide
> > vtk6 as a separate source package (see what happen with tiff4/5 for
> > example), to allow for a smooth transition. As stated before, I will
> > not get involved in this process, so feel free to handle it the way
> > you think is right.
> >
> > 2cts
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Anton Gladky <gladk@debian.org> wrote:
> >> I have started to package v6.0, but I am not sure, when it will be packaged.
> >> From my point of view, there is no big reasons to upload 5.10.
> >>
> >> Anton
> >>
> >> 2013/9/11 Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>:
> >>> [top post sorry]
> >>>
> >>> As i explained, I was talking about vtk 5.10.1, I have no clue how
> >>> hard it is to package vtk 6.0.0
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: libvtk
- From: Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre@debian.org>
- References:
- libvtk
- From: ST <smntov@gmail.com>
- Re: libvtk
- From: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
- Re: libvtk
- From: Anton Gladky <gladk@debian.org>
- Re: libvtk
- From: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
- Re: libvtk
- From: Anton Gladky <gladk@debian.org>