Re: Packages maintained by Debian Science maintainers but missing in tasks files

[Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>]

Hi Thomas,

On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 05:35:37AM +0100, Thomas Krennwallner wrote:
> > > It would be really great if you would consider supporting Debian Science
> > > users by working together to get well designed Debian Science tasks.
> 
> There is an effort to group logic-related packages in debian-science
> together [2], but this has not been completed yet.  The following
> packages maintained by me are currently not in any task file: clasp,
> coala, depqbf, gringo.
> 
> Should we create a new task "Logic"?

I'd be in favour of this.

BTW, I noticed that there are some false positives in my list which is
basically for source packages of libraries.  We usually put user
applications (so <lib>-utils or <lib>-tools) packages in the tasks and
libfoo-dev packages into *-dev tasks.  My query contained some source
packages where the libfoo-dev package was properly put into one of the
available tasks and thus no action is required.  In a most probably
necessary second round I will try to clean up this.

Thanks to all those who just sended patches

      Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de