Re: Packaging and sponsoring of ompl (Was: r3898 - in /projects/science/trunk/debian-science/tasks: robotics robotics-dev)

[Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>]

Hi Leopold,

On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 09:45:36AM +0100, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote:
> > Yep.  Perhaps some "echo 'Supressing tests for <some reason>'" might be
> > helpful.
> 
> done in rules file with override_dh_auto_test,

OK, this builds now.

I checked for lintian issues:

$ lintian ompl_0.13.0+git20130920.01d0ca4-1_amd64.changes 
I: ompl source: binary-control-field-duplicates-source field "section" in package libompl7
I: ompl source: binary-control-field-duplicates-source field "section" in package ompl-demos
I: ompl source: duplicate-long-description libompl-dev libompl7 ompl-demos
I: ompl source: vcs-field-not-canonical http://git.debian.org/?p=debian-science/packages/ompl.git http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-science/packages/ompl.git
I: ompl source: vcs-field-not-canonical git://git.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/ompl.git git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-science/packages/ompl.git
I: ompl source: debian-watch-contains-dh_make-template
I: libompl7: spelling-error-in-binary usr/lib/libompl.so.0.13.0 tEH the
I: libompl7: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/libompl.so.0.13.0
W: ompl-demos: unusual-interpreter usr/share/ompl/demos/PlannerData.py #!DYLD_FALLBACK_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/local/lib


Some of the 'I' severity issues are easy to fix.  Since I'm a bit
nitpicking I would really like you to fix the
debian-watch-contains-dh_make-template thingy - this is a *real* watch
file and no example, right. ;-)

Also the Warning should definitely be fixed.

> Deleted tag and created again with the new pushed version of the package.

I think it makes things more easy if I'm doing the debian/* tagging
since this is what we are really uploading.  Otherwise we might play
tagging ping-pong once some changes might be required.

Kind regards

      Andreas.


-- 
http://fam-tille.de