[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Wiki for science package is damaged



Additional notes:
  The subject is wrong - the pages in question are *not* Wiki pages.

On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 08:45:10AM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> That is because UDD is currently not exposed via DDE (ie not listed on
> http://dde.debian.net/dde/?list).
> Related discussion is
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2012/03/msg00043.html
> but I am myself not clear on what is the current status/plan?

That's perfectly unrelated.  The move to better hardware was done last
year and the performance is way better.  As I said previously: I'll do
some investigation in the beginning of next week in case nobody else has
cared before.

Kind regards

       Andreas.

 
> On Thu, 11 Apr 2013, melchiaros wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> 
> > this mornign was a change on:
> 
> > http://blends.alioth.debian.org/science/tasks/linguistics
> 
> > and
> 
> > http://blends.alioth.debian.org/science/tasks/dataacquisition
> 
> > and maybe other project sides,
> 
> > which has dropped the long descriptions of the software packages.
> 
> > Instead there are lines like those for example:
> 
> > "??? Missing long description for package apertium"
> 
> > Is it possible to revert this changes and bring back to full descriptions?
> 
> 
> > greetings
> 
> > melchiaros
> -- 
> Yaroslav O. Halchenko
> http://neuro.debian.net http://www.pymvpa.org http://www.fail2ban.org
> Senior Research Associate,     Psychological and Brain Sciences Dept.
> Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755
> Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834                       Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419
> WWW:   http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik        
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: [🔎] 20130411124510.GI5131@onerussian.com">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 20130411124510.GI5131@onerussian.com
> 
> 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


Reply to: