[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RE : RE : RE : cctbx debian package

On Mon, 09. Jul 22:33, Baptiste Carvello wrote:
> Hi Radi, hi Frédéric,
> I'm still around, but I've been fighting with the tools (cowbuilder
> mostly, it now works, and I get the same build error as Frédéric).
Did you checkout my latest commits. I fixed the build errors.
> Regarding the python packages, I don't think we can rely much on the
> upstream build system, as they just set PYTHONPATH and use the modules
> in-place in the source tree. So we'll have to copy the .py files, and
> maybe a few data files too (not sure, I found some, but they seem to
> only be used in tests).
> As far as the setup.py is concerned, my proposition would be to write a
> fake 'build' stage that executes after the upstream build system and
> only copies the files to the appropriate places, so that the distutils
> 'install' stage can find them.
I thought so too. My intension with this setup.py file was only to get a clean
installation of the modules. If just cp the *ext.so from ./lib to cctbx_sources
and call:
python setup.py install --root=/whatever/path
we already get a clean install.
As for now all Shlibs will go into ./lib/usr/lib. So they can be copied then
I guess the best would be to specify a prefix during the build. But I'm not
entirely sure yet. The problem is there are so much shlibs build. A few of them
should go into seperate binary packages (libcctbx0, libsctbx0...) I can easily
do this with regex but I'd like a more elegant method.


Reply to: