Re: RFS: critterding
Le mercredi 27 janvier 2010 à 10:46 +0100, Gabriele Giacone a écrit :
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 8:05 AM, Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> wrote:
> > The point is: If a sponsor sees a need for applying minor changes to
> > your work it is much easier to propagate these via VCS (bee it git or
> > svn) than a sequence of mails and reuploading to mentors. Group
> > maintenance and sponsoring becomes way easier when using a VCS and
> > so I wished the wording would be stronger to make people use it.
>
> IMHO, if we're talking about packages that constantly need, for
> whatever reasons, to be modified and to be modified by different
> maintainers, yes, VCS would be better without a doubt.
> For other packages and for unexpected sponsor needs, "apt-get source
> <package>" + changes + upload can be enough.
Sorry but I don't agree with you. VCS is important to keep history, tags
and also allow new maintainers to contribute within a team.
I upload it once you import it.
Sylvestre
Reply to: