Re: {debian, pkg}-science repository [Was: Science linguistics and debian-science SVN repository at alioth]
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 6:43 PM, David Bremner <bremner@unb.ca> wrote:
> It does not seem to make sense to me to get carried away with
> infrastructure from the very start (also, like almost everyone else, I
> have only so much time for Debian). What do we need minimally to get
> started? I would say a list of more specific and related projects,
> and some kind of brief description of the goals. I would also suggest
> that any kind of categorization take place in a wiki/webpage, so it is
> fluid. Also git naturally produces a one repo per package viewpoint
> (which is a bit awkward for people like pkg-perl, but not so
> conclusive for us, I think).
Hey there; if I wanted to get started with the a list of related
projects and the programs to be categorized in some ontology on the
wiki, where would I start? What sources would I trudge through to find
this information? I'd be interested in doing a broad review of all
debian-science software packages in the repo, but know that apt-cache
search science will not bring up everything.
- Bryan
http://heybryan.org/
Reply to: