[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debtags, debram and packages description reviews

--- Frederic Lehobey <Frederic.Lehobey@free.fr> wrote:

> Hi,
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 03:48:20PM +0000, Thaddeus H. Black wrote:
> > > A project that may worth have a look or even be
> > > involved in is the debtags effort:
> > 
> > If relevant, I happen to be deep into debtags
> > development.
> I'd wish to be involved in the debtags classification effort (I
> already subscribed to some debtags mailing list).  A first glance at
> debtags tools showed me that I will need a bit more time (that I have
> not yet) to get used to them and be able to classify properly.
> > If the matter strongly interests anyone here, he should
> > install debram, give the command 'debram -p 14', and
> > observe the package classification system there.  The
> > '14' indicates debram division [1400 Mathematics,
> > Physical Science and Cryptography].
> Yes.  I found "debram -r 14" to be quite interesting.  Is it described
> anywhere how debram and debtags efforts are planned to be merged?
> An other QA effort I have mentioned on
> http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianScienceClassification and that could
> easily get on a pair with classification is the packages description
> review effort.  I believe we should be concerned at least with the
> science packages descriptions.
> Best regards,
> Frederic Lehobey

Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 

Reply to: