[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debtags, debram and packages description reviews

Sorry about the previous message.

--- Frederic Lehobey <Frederic.Lehobey@free.fr> wrote:
> An other QA effort I have mentioned on
> http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianScienceClassification and that could
> easily get on a pair with classification is the packages description
> review effort.  I believe we should be concerned at least with the
> science packages descriptions.

I think we should be *more* concerned with getting top-notch package
descriptions than with confusing classification schemes.  A well written
package description helps not only Debian but the overall scientific community.
 Because http://packages.debian.org has a high page-rank, out packages often
appear at the top of web-search results.


Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 

Reply to: