Re: Debtags, debram and packages description reviews
Sorry about the previous message.
--- Frederic Lehobey <Frederic.Lehobey@free.fr> wrote:
> An other QA effort I have mentioned on
> http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianScienceClassification and that could
> easily get on a pair with classification is the packages description
> review effort. I believe we should be concerned at least with the
> science packages descriptions.
I think we should be *more* concerned with getting top-notch package
descriptions than with confusing classification schemes. A well written
package description helps not only Debian but the overall scientific community.
Because http://packages.debian.org has a high page-rank, out packages often
appear at the top of web-search results.
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around