[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: jekyll



On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 12:20:57AM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, dem 19.01.2023 um 10:42 +0100 schrieb Cédric Boutillier:
> > 
> > When reading the email from the release team this morning, I realized
> > that the deadline to (re)introduce new packages in testing is just a
> > couple of days after the end of our workshop. Since jekyll and all its
> > plugins are now removed from testing, I am a bit worried that if we wait
> > for the sprint to work on these packages, there is a chance that their
> > migration from unstable to testing won't happen in a timely manner.
> 
> That poses an issue, indeed. Bad timing for the soft freeze. Can we speak to
> the release team? I mean you announced the meeting in December?!
> > 
> > Would it make sense to try to upload now an unperfect version of the
> > package with some tests disabled and relaxed dependency on ruby-liquid
> > (and maybe a newer upstream version?), to try to get it in testing
> > again? That would give us more flexibility to deal with the remaining
> > problems.
> 
> It is not only Jekyll. There are plenty of AUTORM-marked packages which are
> scheduled for removal by the beginning of February and before we really start
> to work. We need to keep an eye on them and postpone the scheduled removal date
> to give us time to work on them.

Note that if you write anything to the bug report, the AUTORM counter is
reset so we can easily avoid that. i.e. we can write to all relevant bug
reports saying "This will be worked on during the upcoming Ruby sprint"
etc etc.

> > NB: I haven't tried to patches for liquid5 locally, and I don't measure
> > clearly what are the implications…
> 
> There is now an official patch attempt by upstream. So I hope that their
> attempt won't have much implications.
> 
> I'd have hoped to concentrante on that in Paris, not now. But if necessary,
> I'll dedicate some time beforehand.

For some reason I woke up today 2 hours earlier than usual, and gave it
a try. I have an almost working jekyll package.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: