[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Change in bundler behaviour for gems installed in vendor_ruby directory?



Am Sonntag, dem 23.01.2022 um 14:31 -0300 schrieb Antonio Terceiro:
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 03:18:36PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> > On ഞാ, ജനു 23 2022 at 08:20:38 രാവിലെ +0100 +0100, Cédric Boutillier
> > <boutil@debian.org> wrote:
> > > Hi Praveen,
> > > 
> > > Thanks for all the converted packages!
> > > 
> > 
> > So many packages just for gitaly, and I think gitlab will have even more
> > packages to convert. So more hands to convert the remaining ones welcome. I
> > will share the list of gitlab dependencies later.
> 
> I'm not sure "just converting" everything in a hurry is a good way of
> going about this.  Even though we do want to standardize on that layout
> at some point, maybe we should wait a little bit for a fix in rubygems.

But could we make it the default? Maybe with the current debhelper-compat
level? Then we don't have to write the "magic" lines in d/rules every time we
touch a package. What do you think?

Regards, Daniel
-- 
Regards,
Daniel Leidert <dleidert@debian.org> | https://www.wgdd.de/
GPG-Key RSA4096 / BEED4DED5544A4C03E283DC74BCD0567C296D05D
GPG-Key ED25519 / BD3C132D8B3805D1808123AB7ACE00941E338C78

https://www.fiverr.com/dleidert
https://www.patreon.com/join/dleidert

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: