Re: RM request for coquelicot and its reverse deps?
Hi,
On 20-02-12 00:29:55, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> can we file RM requests for coquelicot and its reverse dependencies
> like ruby- haml-magic-translations? Both are dead upstream and have RC
> bugs. ruby-haml- magic-translations further (build-)depends on a
> non-available ruby-haml version and is not trivial to fix to work with
> ruby-haml 5 (I just tried; or maybe it's just the tests which need
> fixing?). So IMHO if we keep these packages we actually become the new
> upstream for these packages. coquelicot has just two installations
> according to popcon.
>
> Can we agree on filing RM requests?
Not yet please -- I would like to check with some people before doing
so.
I'll keep you posted,
cheers,
Georg
Reply to: