Re: RM request for coquelicot and its reverse deps?
Hi Daniel, all,
On 20-02-11 23:42:11, Georg Faerber wrote:
> On 20-02-12 00:29:55, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> > can we file RM requests for coquelicot and its reverse dependencies
> > like ruby- haml-magic-translations? Both are dead upstream and have RC
> > bugs. ruby-haml- magic-translations further (build-)depends on a
> > non-available ruby-haml version and is not trivial to fix to work with
> > ruby-haml 5 (I just tried; or maybe it's just the tests which need
> > fixing?). So IMHO if we keep these packages we actually become the new
> > upstream for these packages. coquelicot has just two installations
> > according to popcon.
> >
> > Can we agree on filing RM requests?
>
> Not yet please -- I would like to check with some people before doing
> so.
Please go ahead in regards to the removal, and let me know if you need
support, e.g. with filling bug reports, etc.
Cheers,
Georg
Reply to: