[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Failing autopkgtest for ruby-rails-assets-autosize and perfect-scrollbar





On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 5:38 PM Pirate Praveen <praveen@onenetbeyond.org> wrote:


On തി, ജനു 28, 2019 at 4:43 രാവിലെ, Utkarsh Gupta
<guptautkarsh2102@gmail.com> wrote:
> [Removing debian-devel from the thread]
>
> On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 5:39 PM Utkarsh Gupta
> <guptautkarsh2102@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying to run autopkgtest for ruby-rails-assets-autosize and
>> ruby-rails-assets-perfect-scrollbar on my system via the command:
>> autopkgtest -B ../ruby-rails-assets-autosize_4.0.2+dfsg-1_all.deb --
>> schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild
>>
>> Now, it fails the test and the logs can be found at
>> https://ghostbin.com/paste/3qbfn
>> In the end, it says:
>> Sprockets::FileNotFound: couldn't find file 'rails-ujs' with type
>> 'application/_javascript_'
>
> Just did a quick check and found out that a couple of gems are
> getting affected by the same.
> Not only these 2, but a quick search tells me 4 more gems are being
> affected by "rails-ujs" and is blocking other packages.
>
>>
>> On taking a closer look, I found out that ruby-ujs in no longer
>> maintained and the project has been archived. The README says that
>> the project has been merged with rails 5.1.
>> But even then, the autopkgtest is failing. Even 'gem install
>> rails-ujs' throws an error, which is obvious.
>> Although, meta/build seems to be working just fine (except for the
>> autopkgtest).
>>
>> What is the workaround here?
>> Should we possibly disable the tests for now?

This is actual bug so disabling the tests is not the solution.
rails-ujs is not included in ruby-actionview package, which should be
fixed.

Ah. How do we go about it then?
I have no idea how to patch this up. So considered disabling the tests.
Please let me know what you have in mind.
 
>> Because this is a dependency of diaspora which we are trying to
>> package and get it running at the earliest.
>>
>>
>> Best,
>> Utkarsh

Reply to: