Re: RFS: ruby-uuid
On 2019, ജനുവരി 17 5:53:19 PM IST, Abhijith PA <abhijith@teknik.io> wrote:
>Hi Praveen.
>
>On Tuesday 15 January 2019 07:51 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2019, ജനുവരി 14 10:34:39 PM IST, Abhijith PA <abhijith@teknik.io>
>wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> On Monday 14 January 2019 10:16 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 07:42:26AM +0530, Abhijith PA wrote:
>>>>> Hi Utkarsh
>>>>>
>>>>> On Saturday 12 January 2019 12:55 AM, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've updated the Debian package of the Ruby gem *uuid*. The
>package
>>> was
>>>>>> tested on sbuild and was successfully built. It was also lintian
>>> clean.
>>>>>> I've updated the package in the salsa repo which may be found at
>>>>>> https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-uuid
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This was listed under "Patch Updates" task for diaspora, which
>may
>>> be found at
>>>>>> https://git.fosscommunity.in/debian-ruby/TaskTracker/issues/133
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please consider to review and upload it.
>>>>>
>>>>> There is no change in upstream source other than the person just
>>> bumped
>>>>> version in gemspec file. If you can loosen version in its reverse
>>>>> dependencies there is no need of an upload. :)
>>>>
>>>> This sounds like doing a few pointless uploads to avoid a single
>one.
>>> :)
>>>
>>> In this case, I don't think so.
>>>
>>> -a
>>
>> Maintaining a patch, especially for a package like diaspora and
>gitlab, which already has many patches we cannot avoid, is more work
>than a simple update.
>
>Its just using current version of ruby-uuid in control file of the
>package diaspora. Isn't it. I don't understand the need of patch.
We run `bundle install --local` in postinst to verify we have all required versions and if we don't update a package, we will need to patch Gemfile as well.
>
>--abhijith
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Reply to: