Re: RFS: ruby-uuid
Hi Praveen.
On Tuesday 15 January 2019 07:51 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>
>
> On 2019, ജനുവരി 14 10:34:39 PM IST, Abhijith PA <abhijith@teknik.io> wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> On Monday 14 January 2019 10:16 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 07:42:26AM +0530, Abhijith PA wrote:
>>>> Hi Utkarsh
>>>>
>>>> On Saturday 12 January 2019 12:55 AM, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I've updated the Debian package of the Ruby gem *uuid*. The package
>> was
>>>>> tested on sbuild and was successfully built. It was also lintian
>> clean.
>>>>> I've updated the package in the salsa repo which may be found at
>>>>> https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-uuid
>>>>>
>>>>> This was listed under "Patch Updates" task for diaspora, which may
>> be found at
>>>>> https://git.fosscommunity.in/debian-ruby/TaskTracker/issues/133
>>>>>
>>>>> Please consider to review and upload it.
>>>>
>>>> There is no change in upstream source other than the person just
>> bumped
>>>> version in gemspec file. If you can loosen version in its reverse
>>>> dependencies there is no need of an upload. :)
>>>
>>> This sounds like doing a few pointless uploads to avoid a single one.
>> :)
>>
>> In this case, I don't think so.
>>
>> -a
>
> Maintaining a patch, especially for a package like diaspora and gitlab, which already has many patches we cannot avoid, is more work than a simple update.
Its just using current version of ruby-uuid in control file of the
package diaspora. Isn't it. I don't understand the need of patch.
--abhijith
Reply to: