[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: ruby-uuid




On 2019, ജനുവരി 14 10:34:39 PM IST, Abhijith PA <abhijith@teknik.io> wrote:
>Hi.
>
>On Monday 14 January 2019 10:16 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 07:42:26AM +0530, Abhijith PA wrote:
>>> Hi Utkarsh
>>>
>>> On Saturday 12 January 2019 12:55 AM, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I've updated the Debian package of the Ruby gem *uuid*. The package
>was
>>>> tested on sbuild and was successfully built. It was also lintian
>clean.
>>>> I've updated the package in the salsa repo which may be found at 
>>>> https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-uuid
>>>>
>>>> This was listed under "Patch Updates" task for diaspora, which may
>be found at 
>>>> https://git.fosscommunity.in/debian-ruby/TaskTracker/issues/133
>>>>
>>>> Please consider to review and upload it.
>>>
>>> There is no change in upstream source other than the person just
>bumped
>>> version in gemspec file. If you can loosen version in its reverse
>>> dependencies there is no need of an upload. :)
>> 
>> This sounds like doing a few pointless uploads to avoid a single one.
>:)
>
>In this case, I don't think so.
>
>-a

Maintaining a patch, especially for a package like diaspora and gitlab, which already has many patches we cannot avoid, is more work than a simple update.

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.


Reply to: