On 09/22/2017 06:02 PM, Sophie Brun wrote: > I had also checked if there was another binary with this name in > archive. I don't know if the best is to keep the upstream name or to > change it to a less "generic" name (maybe gitlab-cli?). I think gitlab-cli would be a better name for the package (as it in not a ruby library, but a program) and /usr/bin/gitlab is fine I think as gitlab package itself don't provide any binary (its unlikely in the future too).
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature